Nov 30

When is a UFWC title match not a UFWC title match?

Share post on:
When is a FIFA 'A' match not a FIFA 'A' match? That is the question. Unfortunately it's not always a question that's easy to answer, and that can cause a bit of a headache for us here at the UFWC. In most cases, UFWC title matches are FIFA 'A' accredited matches. According to FIFA, international 'A' matches are those that are arranged between two FIFA-affiliated national football associations in which both associations field their first national representative team. That seems clear enough, and, usually, the UFWC counts matches listed on the FIFA.com list of fixtures and results. However, inconsistencies in historical classification mean it's not always possible to rely on FIFA's records. By FIFA's own admission, its records have been sourced from various third parties, and it cannot vouch for their complete accuracy. This raises several questions, not least of which is, what has happened to FIFA's yearbooks recording the 'A' matches that each national association was required to register? But the main question facing us at the UFWC is, what do we do when a match's categorisation is disputed? For example, take the case of two Scotland matches from 1929: Norway 3-7 Scotland on 26 May 1929; and Netherlands 0-2 Scotland on 4 June 1929. The Scottish FA regards both of these games as 'A' matches, and lists them as so on its website. However, their Norwegian and Dutch counterparts don't agree. The Norwegian FA consider their game against Scotland in 1929 to have been a 'test match'. Similarly, the Dutch don't consider their match to have been official because they were still fielding amateur players at that time, while the Scots were professionals. FIFA has retrospectively removed both games from its records, and from its website. However, crucially, as the games were regarded as full internationals at the time, they remain in the UFWC record books as full title matches. The fact that one or other of the teams may have been amateurs does not necessarily mean that those teams were not the first representative teams of those nations. Many early UFWC matches involved amateur teams - indeed in the early years of football all teams were amateurs - and almost all of these matches remain in the FIFA record books. So we can accept that there will be some inconsistency regarding results delving back into football's formative years, but what happens when disputes occur over more recent matches? Take, for example, two matches from the 1995 Carlsberg Cup Chinese New Year Tournament, played in Hong Kong: Colombia 0-1 South Korea on 31 January 1995; and South Korea 0-1 Yugoslavia on 4 February 1995. Although at the time these two games were regarded as full internationals, they have subsequently been removed from FIFA's records because South Korea apparently fielded an under-21 side. However, 10 of the 11 South Korean players fielded by against Colombia played in their country's next match, against China on 19 February 1995. And that match still stands in the FIFA records. So the under-21 argument doesn't wash. For UFWC purposes, both of these results stand. Another major headache for UFWC statisticians is when title-holders play two simultaneous matches in different countries. This curious situation first occurred on 5 March 1892, when UFWC champs England played both Wales and Ireland in separate matches on the same day, with two completely different line-ups. So, England despatched 11 (mostly amateur) players to Wales, and another 11 to Ireland. Both won 2-0, retaining the UFWC title for England, and thankfully alleviating the potential scenario of two different nations having a claim to the title. Both matches stand as A matches, so both stay in the UFWC records. This situation happened again on 30 September 1945 and on 15 September 1946, both times involving UFWC title holders Sweden. The Swedes played Finland and Denmark, and Finland and Norway respectively. Sweden won all four games, again avoiding potential problems in determining which nation ended up as champions. Again, the matches remain in the UFWC record books. So we're not going to retrospectively remove games from the UFWC records due to reclassification. But what about cases where errors are found in the records? Take the case of this match: Wales 2-2 England on 29 March 1904. Only, the match didn't take place on 29 March 1904. It took place on 29 February, as spotted by UFWC statistical guru Peter Waring. Oops. On 29 February 1904 Ireland were UFWC champions, so the Wales vs England match was not a title match. The error means this game has been removed from the UFWC record books. As it was a draw, and there was no change of title holder or ranking point award, there is no effect on the UFWC lineage or rankings table. Will there be further reclassifications and disputes? Probably. (And if you spot any errors in the UFWC records do let us know.) But rather than look back, we prefer to look forward. Thankfully we can be pretty confident about which forthcoming matches will be FIFA 'A' matches, and therefore which will be UFWC title matches. Take, for example, a little match taking place on 11 August between Mexico and Spain. Definitely an 'A' match. Definitely a title match. Definitely one to look forward to. what do you reckon?

Related offers

4
Bet £15 Get £10 Free Bet

Extensive coverage of Global leagues with over 20 Sports available for sports fans over the world 24/7.

New customers only. Wager £15 on a Sport to activate the Free Bet Token. Minimum deposit of £10. Get a free bet of £10. Customers who deposit using PayPal, Neteller, Paysafe, Skrill or Skrill 1-Tap will not be eligible. Free bet must be used within 14 days of being credited. The free bet token will be awarded once you have made your first deposit and have bet £15 on Sports with odds of Evens (2.00) or greater. The Free Bet Token can only be used on a bet with total odds of 4/5 (1.80) or higher. T&Cs apply

4
Bet £19, Get £66 In Free Bets

One of the fasting growing Bookies in the UK with a focus on innovation in online betting and casino.

Full T&Cs Apply. New customers only. The £19+ Qualifying Bet (min odds 1.80). Max 4 x £10, 4 x £5, 1x £6 Free Bets credited on qualifying bet settlement on selected events. 1x claim per customer. Void, cashed out, partially cashed out bets do not qualify. Each Way bets, system bets and profit boost are not permitted for qualifying bet. Free bets are non-withdrawable & not returned with winnings. Free bets expire after 7 days of qualifying bet settlement.

5
Bet £10 & Get £50 In Free Bets

Rated #1 Online Football Bookmaker.

Min deposit requirement. Free Bets are paid as Bet Credits and are available for use upon settlement of qualifying bets. Min odds, bet and payment method exclusions apply. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. Time limits and T&Cs apply.

4
Get A £10 Free Bet When You Join Netbet

Great for Accumulators, utilise their Bet Maker for previously unavailable ACCA bet selections.

Customers will qualify for the free bet once their first £10 qualifying bets on sports have been placed and then settled on the account. Cashed out qualifying bets will not qualify for the offer. Customers must place a qualifying bet within 30 days of registration and for the bet to settle.

3.5
50% Bonus On Sports Up To £60

Dafabet offers over 30,000 live betting events every month. It's the place for sports betting and casino games.

This promotion is exclusive for new players. This promotion is available for player located in Austria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Macedonia, Netherlands, Norway, Russia, Slovakia, or Sweden. There is a minimum deposit requirement of EUR15/USD10 in order for you to be eligible for the bonus. Only Sports bets will be counted for the wagering requirement. Draw, voided, cashed out and refunded bets will not count towards any wagering requirement calculation. Wagering Requirement: 15x (Deposit + Bonus) on odds 1.50 and above to be able to withdraw.